Nothing is as simple as the matters that they deal with in the small cases court. I guess it has been designed with a view on deciding on issues that nobody really cares about. last time I was present out there on my trainee course, I heard a case of broken pipes. A lady tried to blame
Plumbers London for breaking her pipes and causing the whole water system to need reparation. That was just ridiculous. I mean.. what is the cost of such a thing? We live in a world that fifty or hundred dollars don"t really mean a thing in. that is obvious to me, people who cannot afford to pay for such things on their own shouldn"t also have enough money to take such matters to the court, isn"t that logical? Anyway, Plumbers London had to delegate their representative to the court and the case was running. After all, they had to pay two hundred dollars for the damages and the case was over. That is when you try to get your money from Plumbers London. In other cases it may be way more difficult, you know what I mean? in other cases it may turn out that they need much more evidence, that the harm that the deed has done is bigger and stuff like that. normally, accusation is not that easy to put on somebody. Blame is blame, no matter what kind of court we are talking about.
